This artistic scenario shows that a masterpiece can only be achieved through human creative talent, not by mindless clicking a computer mouse. The brilliant twist 15. Nc3!! in the play leads to the efficient use of material (economy) and prevents you from becoming bored by the mechanical nature of play.
Thomas Niessen
25 дней назад
I can spontaneously think of two ways to find this example without significant human effort. If the stipulation would be "White wins", I would even know a third way. See therefore https://eg.org.ua/chessgame/halskim-0413-11g1b5/ after 2. .. Rxc1.
And please, let no one misunderstand me here: the example is wonderful, and I have no reason to assume that the author did not create these studies himself.
Marcin Kania
25 дней назад
I am not interested in the names above the diagrams; I try to focus on specific, beautiful or spectacular works (works of art or wonderful puzzles). Sometimes, creators make strange decisions — as if they forget they are creating these works for others (solvers or enthusiasts) rather than for themselves or for machines. That is why I see no point in speculating about how or why a work was created, or who the author is.
Megalomania, egocentrism, conformity, ostracism, and sarcasm are destroying the art of chess composition and lead to senseless confrontations.
This artistic scenario shows that a masterpiece can only be achieved through human creative talent, not by mindless clicking a computer mouse. The brilliant twist 15. Nc3!! in the play leads to the efficient use of material (economy) and prevents you from becoming bored by the mechanical nature of play.
I can spontaneously think of two ways to find this example without significant human effort. If the stipulation would be "White wins", I would even know a third way. See therefore https://eg.org.ua/chessgame/halskim-0413-11g1b5/ after 2. .. Rxc1.
And please, let no one misunderstand me here: the example is wonderful, and I have no reason to assume that the author did not create these studies himself.
I am not interested in the names above the diagrams; I try to focus on specific, beautiful or spectacular works (works of art or wonderful puzzles). Sometimes, creators make strange decisions — as if they forget they are creating these works for others (solvers or enthusiasts) rather than for themselves or for machines. That is why I see no point in speculating about how or why a work was created, or who the author is.
Megalomania, egocentrism, conformity, ostracism, and sarcasm are destroying the art of chess composition and lead to senseless confrontations.
I did my homework two and a half years ago:
https://endgame-studies.jimdofree.com/2024/02/27/on-a-study-from-magyar-sakkvilag-2023/
The question of what constitutes an original in this context remained unanswered.