Elegant and solver-friendly miniature with sparkling conclusion, pointed play (rook domination) and natural position. Of course, 3. Rh5 is more natural than 3. Rg5, but the domination on the empty board and the surprising block mate are impressive nonetheless. (3,5 points)
I also don’t see a big problem. Yes, there is the Ra5/Rb5 choice, but for the rest, the studies work in quite different ways. This is the kind of partial anticipation that costs about 0,5 points at most.
Elegant and solver-friendly miniature with sparkling conclusion, pointed play (rook domination) and natural position. Of course, 3. Rh5 is more natural than 3. Rg5, but the domination on the empty board and the surprising block mate are impressive nonetheless. (3,5 points)
The idea of the study is not new — (V. Tarasyuk, Z. Birnov MT, 2005, hm.)
The competent viewer can decide for himself whether this study is a (partial) anticipation.
I’m not agree with anticipation, based on difference between try. Solutions are different, sure.
And so it happens that I once agree with the «bad study composer». 🙂
I also don’t see a big problem. Yes, there is the Ra5/Rb5 choice, but for the rest, the studies work in quite different ways. This is the kind of partial anticipation that costs about 0,5 points at most.