The logical try (6. Rd1?) in the finale is very welcome and valuable. It's a wonderful piece of work and completely original in a creative (artistic) sense. A work of art!
This is probably your joke. Unless it's some kind of elaborate principle of which some are the accidental beneficiaries, and often the victims.
This innovative work has a brilliant script from the beginning, i.e. from a seemingly weak (but thematic!) key.
6... Ka2 is imporatant variant for the logical try, and not a worthless side play.
Previously ("before computers"), the side play was primarily used to prove the validity of studies. It still led to over 30% incorrectness. Now, there's a natural possibility to use the potential of the side play in a creative way.
Автор немножко удлинил такой этюд
The logical try (6. Rd1?) in the finale is very welcome and valuable. It's a wonderful piece of work and completely original in a creative (artistic) sense. A work of art!
Вот если бы логика и красивые ходы были в одном варианте, тогда было бы искусство.
This is probably your joke. Unless it's some kind of elaborate principle of which some are the accidental beneficiaries, and often the victims.
This innovative work has a brilliant script from the beginning, i.e. from a seemingly weak (but thematic!) key.
6... Ka2 is imporatant variant for the logical try, and not a worthless side play.
Previously ("before computers"), the side play was primarily used to prove the validity of studies. It still led to over 30% incorrectness. Now, there's a natural possibility to use the potential of the side play in a creative way.