Two logical tries 1. Rc6? and 2. Rg5? ending in ideal stalemates and a logical context using pawn X position (Kh3, Ph4, Pg2 - kg6 pg7) with four different positions of the white "g" pawn (g2, g3, g4, g5 - task). It is only a fragment of the original work.
It is the third example of a shortened version of a potentially artistic work by a distinguished composer, but without the added unnecessary and ugly foreplay. I think it's a perfect example for discussion.
Particularly interesting in the original version is the try 1. Rc8? gxf5!, which tries to justify the position of the white bishop. 🙂
Two logical tries 1. Rc6? and 2. Rg5? ending in ideal stalemates and a logical context using pawn X position (Kh3, Ph4, Pg2 - kg6 pg7) with four different positions of the white "g" pawn (g2, g3, g4, g5 - task). It is only a fragment of the original work.
It is the third example of a shortened version of a potentially artistic work by a distinguished composer, but without the added unnecessary and ugly foreplay. I think it's a perfect example for discussion.
Particularly interesting in the original version is the try 1. Rc8? gxf5!, which tries to justify the position of the white bishop. 🙂